Picture
The Barrister

Toronto has once again proven that they're bat-shit crazy.  Signing Connolly to a contract with $4.75 million hit only makes sense when you consider how completely garbage that team was last year. Yet, here I am, a couple days out, and I'm still seeing asinine defenders of the contract, of Connolly himself.  Maybe its just that those of us happy to see him gone are calmed by the knowledge that we won't have to live in a constant sense of worry that he'll shatter into a million pieces when he takes a body check into the boards.  Or maybe we're also happy to know that Buffalo's per capita interest in water sports has just decreased significantly, and that's never a bad thing.  Either way, the anti-TC crowd has been largely quiet over the past few days, and we're left with some apologists who want to rewrite Timmy's history with the Sabres. 

Now, before I go off on my journey of debunking a particularly absurd thread of this thinking, it bears mentioning that I like Connolly.  During Episode #8 of the CrapTastiCast, while talking about Stafford's signing, I made it clear that I would have been happy with resigning him for the right price.  I estimated my threshold at around $2 million/yr, reasoning - like many fans - that such a salary was commiserate with TC's actual value to the team.  More than that, though, I wanted Connolly to come back and succeed as a Sabre.  I'm not that complicated of a man, and when a player dons the Blue and Gold, I want nothing more than to see that player set the league on fire.  Such was my hope for TC, always, and no one was more aware of those flashes of brilliance that we saw from time to time.  I saw those moments and knew this was a dude who was trying, who cared about winning and winning with the Sabres.  And, for all the talk about fans being unfairly harsh to the guy - and the speculation about the emotional toll that it may have taken on him and his play - I'm sad that TC never learned the reality that Sabres fans were just as eager to see him succeed, to cheer him on with full voice, to forgive him for the past failures as he rediscovered his ability to produce, to score. 

One of the things mentioned about Connolly, and the reason for this post in the first place, is that he has always been a producer, a creator, even if not a scorer.  And, the statistics bear this out of late - in 2009-10, especially, TC was on an absurd pace, and really ramped up his assist total during the Sabres' Northeast Division campaign. This year, while that production dropped a tick, it was still decent, not to mention his utility as a PK and PP guy.  I get it, and its those considerations that made me think him worth a look at $2 million.  But, the dealbreaker for many fans, myself included, will remain the the counterpoint - that he was goal-less in 29 playoff games - and that there is simply no justification for that kind of play when you're making as much as TC was with the club.  As Yachter and I discussed last night after craft beers in the heart of Carroll Gardens, Brooklyn, Connolly had the misfortune of being one of the guys who we kept instead of #48 and #23.  Expectations were high, as was his price tag, and he simply has not delivered.

Surprisingly, in response to this central, unassailable point about Connolly's playoff production, I recently saw the most ridiculous claim coming out of one of the Sabres' blogs twitter feeds the other day: That we who refer to "no goals in 29 playoff games" stat should basically shut it, because TC was still productive over that time, with 12 assists and a +2.   

Picture
Worst idea since this asshole started leaping over babies.

I'm not even going to bother attributing this argument about TC's assist and +/- totals since (a) my plan is to demolish this thought so thoroughly that I could really care less about demolishing the person that wrote it, and (b) I think its all-too-likely that a lot of fans would make, or have made, this same argument, so really, this post is meant to put you all in your place as well.

I could spend a few paragraphs of rage on the stupidity of thinking that 12 assists over 29 games is actually an argument for Connolly.  I mean, that's just stupid.  Stupid, stupid, stupid.  But, too easy.  I could also mention how the +/- statistic is both overrated and that it, as applied to this situation, drastically distorts the reality of Connolly's play., as it was simply padded 2007 playoff run, when he was a +6.  He was -2 in both 2010 and 2011. [As for run in 2007, his +/- breaks down as follows, for anyone who cares: +2 against the Isles (no games in minus); +3 against Rangers (no games in minus), +1 against Ottawa (Game 1, -2; Game 2, +1; Game 3, even; game 4, +2; Game 5, even)]

But, these are obviously points lost on some in the remote corners of Sabreland, since we still get the argument that there is value and creativity evident within Connolly's meager playoff stats.  So, instead of just concluding that his less than a 1/2 point per game over this span is reason enough to throw his scraps to the dogs just up the QEW, we'll just assume for a second that such assist production, when one isn't scoring any goals one's self, is at all justifiable.  Fine. You want to actually argue that those 12 assists tell us something about the great player TC is, or that he's worth the cap hit to the Leaves?

Let's dance.

Sabres vs. NYI, 2007 ECQF, Game 1

Here's the first of his moments of "creation" that we're all supposed to be impressed by.  Cue it to 0:40.  TC leads the odd man rush, passes back to trailing Campbell. Pedestrian pass.  Solid goal.

Sabres @ NYI, 2007 ECQF, Game 3

Cue it to 2:20.  Sabres on the 2-man advantage.  TC feeds to Briere down low, and Danny creates that goal by swatting the puck out of mid-air.  This is why fans were sad when Briere left, and why anyone with a brain knows that Danny is worth big money and TC just isn't. I won't pretend this wasn't a good pass - TC threaded the needle to a certain extent, fine.  But, the fact that it was during a 5-on-3 sort of reaffirms what I always feel about Connolly - that he can be a beautiful, creative player, but only when he has a ton of space and time.  Put him under pressure, maybe with a few booing Sabres fans in he mix, and he falls flat.

Incidentally, you know who else scored this game? ADAM MAIR. The first goal, if you care to check.  Adam Mair produces more than TC in the playoffs.  Print it.

Sabres v. NYI, 2007 ECQF, Game 5

Watch from the start, it's the first goal.  TC cycles the puck with a feed to Stafford who is dropping down low.  Stafford comes back up high, bodies his way to middle, scores a sick backhander.  God I love Stafford.  He's a good hockey player.  Someone should sign that guy or something.

(Also, while we're here, watch the 4th goal, too.  ATLAS!!!)

Sabres v. NYR, 2007 ECSF, Game 2

Cue to 0:40.  Sabres on the PP, and Connolly makes a simple pass to Campbell who walks in and buries it from the slot.  Again, pedestrian.  I am sensing a trend here. 

Sabres @ NYR, 2007 ECSF, Game 3

Cue to 2:45.  Sabres on the PP again.  TC makes easy, rather uncontested pass to Briere, who scores a beauty from about 15 ft out. Man, Danny is good at hockey.  Too bad he broke his ankle during an offseason erotic asphyxiation incident.  #UntrueBriereFacts

Sabres @ NYR, 2007 ECSF, Game 4

Cue to 2:24.  Nice feed from below the line to Ales Kotalik out front. First assist, other than the one enabled by the two man advantage, that one can claim was anything but ordinary.  Those passes from below the line are always a little tricky, espcially if you want any hope for the shooter to bury the shot quickly.  Good job, Tim. 

By way of full recognition, I will also say that this was a GREAT game from Tim.  The highlights are full of even better moments from him, including a sick toe drag to his backhand shot as he dances through the defense.  One of those moments of potential that don't mean shit when he hasn't put that potential to any real use in the years since.
 

Sabres v. NYR, 2007 ECSF, Game 5

Cue to 3:04.  Oh man, this was a great fucking goal.  TC takes desperation shot that is saved, rebound comes to Drury who ties the game in by far my favorite moment of the playoffs that year.  Well, either that or Maxim's GWG just seconds later in the highlight reel.  See? Max scored, too.  The much maligned Russian, also with better playoff production than TC.  Yikes.

Sabres v. OTT, 2007 ECF, Game 2

Cue to 2:33.  Another desperation shot from TC, blocked, drops to Briere who buries it to tie the game.  This would have been my favorite moment of playoffs if we'd actually won.  Jesus H. Christ I hate Ottawa.  Right about now, I'm rethinking this trip down memory lane.

Soldiering on, as I must...

And, again noting who else scored that game - Jochen Hecht. #55, who now has a $3.5 million cap hit, had 4 goals in 2007 playoffs.  Injury-plagued since then, at least during the postseason runs of late, he's only played one playoff game since then, registering one assist.

Sabres @ OTT, 2007 ECF, Game 4

Cue to 1:27. Decent feed to Drury, who scores a sick tough-angle shot to the goalie's far side.  Drury made this happen.  Well, Drury and the shit stain of a goalie that is Mr. Raymond "Mama Said Knock You Out" Emery.

Does anyone else miss playing against Ray Emery regularly? Yeah, me too. 

Sabres @ BOS, 2010 ECQF, Game 4

Cue to 5:16.  Mike Grier works hard on forecheck, causing puck to squirt around boards to Timmy, who's on the side board.  TC makes routine back pass, under pressure of the back check, granted.  Montador buries a slapper from the right point, benefiting from a deflection off of Wideman.

Sabres @ PHI, 2011 ECQF, Game 2

Cue to 0:52.  Connoly fakes a slapper and passes to Vanek down low.  Vanek basically jams the puck through Bobrovsky to earn the goal.  Credit to TC for the feed, though it didn't create the opportunity.  Really, there was no genuine opportunity on this play.  Bob just pooped the bed and and got out-worked by Atlas. 

Sabres v. PHI, 2011 ECQF, Game 3

Cue to 1:33.  Timmy fires a wristshot from the point that results in an absurdly fat rebound. Gerbe picks it up about 15 ft out, buries it home with a quick wrister of his own.  Yet another moment of curious Flyer goaltending in this series.  But, seriously, I don't doubt that there's skill needed to execute a hard, low shot that leads to a juicy, buriable rebound.  You know what takes more skill, though? Actually beating the goalie yourself, and not relying on the goalie's ineptitude and quasi-flukey physics to give your teammate a chance to put one in.

Picture
Sadly, I feel like this advice might actually come as news to some folks, TC included


Wrapping up...

Again, the fundamental point is that Connolly was a joke in the playoffs for someone now getting almost $5 million a year.  It's been said that it won't matter, since the Leaves won't make the playoffs, and it's also been said that TC on a line with Kessel may be just what the doctor ordered.  Maybe. 

But you can't get on Twitter and tell the world that Timmy was actually producing in the playoffs just because he was getting a few assists, and expect people to think you're anything but a mindless, apologist twat.  And this is coming from the guy on the blog with a guy named The Apologist.  Seriously, Aps is NEVER that stupid, trust me. 

Of those 12 assists, I count eight that I would classify as completely ordinary.  Of the four that I find at all impressive, one was only an assist because TV is a stud (Game 2 v PHI), one needed Drury to be a magician and Emeery to blow (Game 3 v OTT), and one was on the 2-man advantage with an inordinate amount of space (Game 3 v NYI).  That leaves ONE ASSIST.  One out of twelve, and already absurdly low number, where I can legitimately say that Connolly created the opportunity that led to the goal.  Maybe my standards are too high, but I've watched enough hockey to know when an assist is either (a) the result of the goal scorer being a pimp, or (b) the result of nothing more than luck. Connolly benefited from both of these factors on 11 of his 12 playoff assists since 2007, and to state otherwise is both asinine and ignorant. 

So, if you want to bemoan the fact that we lost TC, or you want to credit Toronto for the signing, fine by me.  I disagree, but I also get that he is a good player who might do well with a change of pace  But don't get on twitter and tell me, by implication, that my reference to Connolly's playoff lack of production is somehow misguided. It makes you look like a contrarian boob who is picking a fight just to pick a fight. 


NOTE: Video below changed as per suggestion of @ScottyMCSS, hereby anointed as most excellent dude, and savior of this post.  I may like Monty Python, but this is FAR better.  I give you,. Philip Seymour Hoffman, playing the part of Connolly Apologist. 


 


Comments

07/04/2011 13:44

This is a good post and I appreciate the effort and research you put into it. Good job. However I disagree to an extent. Obviously, TC has not been good in the playoffs and I would never argue that he has (outside of 05/06 of course). But is it really entirely his fault?

The 2006-07 season, TC missed 80 games with post concussion syndrome -- EIGHTY GAMES!! -- before being inserted into the lineup for two regular season games and the post season. I think it's entirely unfair to expect to him to produce at a much higher level after not playing hockey for roughly a full year, and then being tossed into the most intense playoff grind of any professional sport. On the flipside, the Sabres played a whole season WITHOUT Connolly, so their chemistry was likely no where near it's peak. Theoretically this could have negatively affected his production, as his mates aren't used to his positioning and don't "know where to find him." (I know, hockey is hockey and really a professional could step in and play the game no matter how much time he missed or who his team mates are, but obviously playing together game in and game out over 82 games would be more beneficial than playing with total strangers).

Fast forward to 2009-10, where TC was once again unproductive..... along with the entire Sabres roster besides Thomas Vanek and Tyler Ennis. He was also playing with a broken foot and it was evident he was lacking in speed and refused to take a hit to make a play. I'm not trying to make excuses for the guy (well, I guess I am, really) but seriously-- try playing any sport with a broken foot. They were outmuscled and outmatched by the Bruins, and frankly TC could have played world class hockey and it's unlikely we would have won that series.

This past post-season I really have nothing to defend him with. He wasn't good enough, but he wasn't terrible either.

Anyway once again it was a good read and I totally understand your disdain for the player. I think he will do well in Toronto.

Reply
07/04/2011 15:07

No disdain, just wedded to the reality of his value. My disdain is reserved for the argument that he was actually productive during the last 29 playoff games.

Again, as I wrote, I like TC, just not to the tune of $4.75 million. And, sure, I know his injuries make it all understandable, but they also make him less valuable and more risky.

Either way, now that he's a Leaf - all bets are off. I'll be booing him right along with MacArthur and Kessel and every other dumb shit to put on the blue and white. Eff those guys. Hard.

Reply
07/05/2011 04:33

He also got a modified NTC. Add that to the collection of ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?!s

Reply
Shorties
07/05/2011 13:26

Am I the only one expecting to see a spike in Toronto's short handed goals against now that TC is aboard? Was it just me (and the checking forward of the other team) that could spot TC forcing the pass to the blue line from the high boards? Does anyone else ask themselves this many question other than former DA Frank Clark?

Reply
JrBondi
07/05/2011 21:57

You argue that several of Connolly's assists during the playoffs were "pedestrian passes". Tell me, how many NHL games have you played? How many NHL assists have you attempted, mr internet blogger? Until you have played the game at that level, your opinion about those plays doesn't count for jack. If you have an opinion about someone else's blog, that's fine. But you're not an NHL athlete and you don't have any leverage to judge an NHL athlete's plays, especially considering how you weren't there on the ice when it happened.

Also, another person already commented saying what I was going to say about Connolly coming back from a concussion in 06/07 and playing with a broken foot in 09/10, but I'll add to it. Connolly played 2 games that season, so he pretty much DID come back just for the playoffs, and you know what, he did put up 9 assists. (again, that's 9 more NHL Stanley Cup Playoff assists than you have) By the way, you left out the part where he killed off 10-20 seconds of a pentaly by dancing around the Islanders in the first round, which made the crowd erupt. And regarding his 09/10 performance, the guy LED THE TEAM IN POINTS FOR MOST OF THE SEASON, before sacrificing his foot to block a shot at the end of the season. At which point, Derek Roy slithered his punk arse into the points lead in the 11th hour. Connolly had to play the first (and only round) of the playoffs with a bum foot. I wouldn't blame that on being injury prone, because I've never taken a goddamn NHL quality shot off my foot. Notice that trend?

"But don't get on twitter and tell me, by implication, that my reference to Connolly's playoff lack of production is somehow misguided. It makes you look like a contrarian boob who is picking a fight just to pick a fight."

Verrrrry clever. Shield your opinion by claiming that anyone who questions it is a boob just trying to pick a fight. Clever play.

PS: "God I love Stafford. He's a good hockey player. Someone should sign that guy or something." - Funny how Stafford is also one of those players who vanishes. Ohhhh ahhhh, 31 goals this year... yeah, and 12 of those were scored in 4 games, leaving the rest to be spread out over the remaining games. Can you say, inflated stat? Face it, this guy will NOT score 30 goals next year.

Reply
JrBondi
07/05/2011 22:07

By the way, how many playoff goals/assists does your hero Drew Stafford have? Did you include in your little factoid that Drew had a whopping 1 point more than Connolly in the playoffs this year?

10/11:
Stafford - 3 pts
Connolly - 2 pts

09/10:
Connolly - 1 pt
Stafford - 0 pts

06/07:
Connolly - 9 pts
Stafford - 4 pts

Yup, those important important important playoff stats. Still think "someone should sign Stafford"? Any change of opinion about that guy? At this point, after giving Connolly hell for it, you HAVE TO give Stafford the same, otherwise you're a bigot.

Reply
07/05/2011 22:33

I have been found out. I am bigoted against concussive hockey players made of glass. Thanks for pointing out my prejudice, for the sake of fragile players everywhere.

Reply
The Yachtsman
07/05/2011 23:10

O ASSAILABLE OF MOST ASSAILABLE ARGUMENTS.

"Until you have played the game at that level, your opinion about those plays doesn't count for jack." I'll set aside the primacy of the obvious nihilistic discussion re: if anything does or doesn't count for jack on this blog. I assume you are a member of some new wing of the existentialist school, demonstrated by your statement that you cannot analyze something if you do not have the ability to execute the topic at hand with penultimate skill. Wait, what's that? Ring Lardner, Grantland Rice, et. al. should never have written because they wouldn't have been able to put a fastball into play? Jim Kelley or Red Fisher or Dick Johnston should never have written a drop of ink onto the page because they couldn't roof one from the hashmarks?! Give me a weakly argued break. I had to chew a roll of tums to stomach the rest of your poorly constructed point, by which the end of course I could not make out.

I even wanted to agree with you on Stafford, because actually I think you may be on to something, but then you called The Barrister a bigot.

Also, just so you are clear:

bigot: (N.) (ˈbɪɡət) a person who has very strong, unreasonable beliefs or opinions about race, religion or politics and who will not listen to or accept the opinions of anyone who disagrees - from Oxford's

Apparently the Sabres and/or Tim Connolly are some sort of religion or political party/issue? Or maybe...a race? Not sure. Please clarify.

Enjoy the rest of the blog and I look forward to your hastily comprised and surely lacking response.

Reply
The Yachtsman
07/05/2011 23:30

@The Barrister:

You interweb stalker.

Reply
07/06/2011 00:13

@Yachtsman:

You and I both know that wasn't even the craziest thing google turned up.

Reply
07/06/2011 11:44

You do know that going on google to look for dirt is ad homimen, right? If so, it's a little weird for you to be preaching about staying on topic.

Your over-sensitive reaction to the above posts actually made me laugh this morning. I mean, why did it take you over 30 minutes to follow up on your first post? Were you hunting for big words?

By the way, you kinda proved the point; you're not Jim Kelley or Red Fisher or Dick Johnston. Those people are called "journalists". You know, what bloggers pretend to be?

Reply
The Barrister
07/06/2011 12:02

The ad hominem was intended, so I'm glad it gave you a laugh, Greg. And, in a rare moment of swallowing my pride, I've deleted that response of mine, because you're basically right that it was pretty low of me.

That said, I am completely fine with being the most pathetic person on the internet in your eyes. In fact, if you were to google my real name, you'd find hilarious and dorky and even more pathetic things than I could ever imagine. Fact is, I am neither paid for this, nor do I think I'm all that good at it - it's fun, and not much more. Like it, don't like it? It'll still be fun, espcially when I allow myself to explode in a moment of over-sensitive over-reaction.

Oh, and the "30 minute break" was while I was working on my actual job, actually.

Though, I definitely agree that I worked too hard to respond, and I think it's fair to call me out as a lame, faceless internet pot-shotter. I'm even taking your comment too seriously, right now. THE CYCLE CONTINUES.

See? Fun. Thanks for reading.

Reply
Greg M. - Kenmore
07/06/2011 12:11

Fair enough.

I think you could have responded to the point about ragging on Connolly (though you did give him some credit) for lack of certain things such as playoff points, but giving Stafford a pass for those very same things and actually praising him to the point of almost sending him a Valentine's Day card and a single red rose.

Reply
The Scizz
07/06/2011 12:18

I'm actually laughing at all of you right now. HA HA HA. I'm so cool. I'm writing a post for later today about pro-wrestl....nevermind I have to go now.

Reply
The Scizz
07/06/2011 12:41

Also Greg, if you look closely at the over 30-minute later follow up, it was from a completely different member of the blog. Just sayin'.

O.K., now back to being a pretend journalist who uses the words "fuck", "poop", and "douche-bag" way too much. Thanks for all the website hits! Yay!

Reply
The Barrister
07/06/2011 12:42

@Greg. Sure. Connolly made $4.5 million/yr for the last 2 years. Stafford made $2 million. That's the key difference for me. One has fleeced the Sabres enough, and has tried my patience in turn, the other has not. I'm giving Stafford a pass because he was good value at $2 million, and has yet to be given the opportunity to show whether he's good value at $4 million. TC has shown to be bad value at $4.5 million, and just got a raise.

@TheScizz - I can't wait for the wrestling post. Finally, some class to brighten stuff up here.

Reply
The Yachtsman
07/14/2011 20:06

@Greg

I was the one who wrote the delightfully scathing yet inopportunely timestamped comment before.

I am a completely different person than The Barrister. I am a blogerific sports demi-god.

I could have used Will Leitch, Michael Baron, or Tommy Craggs* too, but I didn't.

....waiting.....

They are all bloggers.

....digressing.....

To drop bombs on us for not being qualified to make opinions on a website we bought for $75 (of which I certainly have not paid Scizz back) is about as easy, cheap, and brainless** as any classic Mike Schopp dismissal.

My qualms were not with the argument he made, they were with the sub-argument that we cannot or should not write on our own website created of our own volition due to lack of qualification.

That is an incredibly weak argument, which you in turn supported in your later comment. By the deductions of said argument, a reporter/writer/journalist/blogger/homeless person cannot nor should not write/espouse opinions on sport in a public forum because if they haven't played they aren't "qualified".

That's fucking fascism (notice my ironic use of a horrifying form of government to mirror the earlier use of bigot).

The last time I checked, what made someone "qualified" to write was a high level of articulation, perhaps a decent education, and a strong to quite strong grasp of language***.

My comment was exposing the argument for what it was: fraudulent. You, dear reader (and we thank you for your support whilst I attempt to interwebly disembowel you), took a divergent and ultimately irrelevant approach. If you want to eviscerate any member of the DGWU crew for our style of writing or our shitty grasp of an argument, please...go ahead. I welcome it. It keeps our game up and ultimately makes us better writers.

But understand the rules of the game before you start firing fastballs between the hashmarks on fourth down from behind the three point line.


SIDENOTE: Big words and fancy language resulted in such documents as Schopenhauer's The World as Will and Representation and the Declaration of Indpendence. Small words and folksy language got us eight years of George W. Bush.




*oxford comma FTW
**oxford comma FTW again
***oxford comma FTW cubed

Reply
The Yachtsman
07/14/2011 20:11

Addendum:

I was wrong. The argument was nowhere near fraudelent. It was nihil ad rem.

/celebratory air humping for using a Latin phrase.

Reply
Greg
07/31/2011 14:36

Did you wait a full week to respond, hoping that I would have moved on and not seen your desperate attempt at getting the last word, fuckhead?

Reply



Leave a Reply


weebly analytics var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-7870337-1']); _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'none']); _gaq.push(['_setAllowLinker', true]); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })();