Picture
Here we go again.
The Barrister

It feels weird to even pay a shred of attention to the Buffalo Sabres - what with the apparent revival of football fever in Western New York - but I felt it necessary to weigh in on the topic of Buffalo professional ice hockey. The preseason has started and, even if it appears otherwise, the DGWU Crew has, in fact, noticed. And as happy as the Bills make me, we all know that it might be simply a matter of time before football stops being as much fun and our collective attention shifts to the bread and butter of the Buffalo sports scene. 

What can I say, I still think these Bills are an 8-8 team, and these Sabres are much more.  I hope.

If you've been paying attention to the summer goings-on of our Sabres, you know full well that there have been a LOT of changes. Blockbuster deals, at least by Buffalo standards; cosmetic refurbs of team facilities, including the de-slug-ifying of the newly named FN Center (a name which I HATE, btw...saved only by the easy joke it enables); an overhaul of team PR and use of media - both traditional, internet and social.  There's been tons of new stuff for us to have discussed as the summer marched on. Though, as you may have noticed, while these things garnered attention throughout the Sabres blogosphere, we at DGWU have been largely silent on these subjects. Perhaps it's a cautious skepticism of the fancy bells and whistles that have come with a new billionaire owner; an uneasy feeling of hypocrisy that accompanies this new role as hockey club; or maybe just the discomfort with my hockey team being run with the profits of arguably horrific assaults on the environment. HYDROFRACKING IS AWFUL BUT MOST OF US ARE OK WITH PEGULA AND THIS IS WEIRD.

It's a confusing ass time, this is for sure.

Yet, as much as I may still battle with my own expectations for this season, preseason has shocked me back into focus to at least start hashing those expectations out here and weigh in with some potentially incoherent rambling.  After the jump, check out the five questions kicking around in my muddled excuse for grey matter, and my baseless speculation on how things may end up playing out.


#1: Will the market-setting deals pay off on the ice?
Picture
Ballsy move with #23, Ville
This is, I think, the primary concern for most Sabres fans as we approach the new season.  Obviously we want the money spent on new players to pay dividends in the win/loss columns, though the simple desire to win doesn't really capture the crux of why the success of our big money players matters so much.

For fans of this small-market, previously thrifty team, the elephant in the room - though, certainly an elephant who has been discussed, but not yet resolved - is whether this transition to "big spender" will blow up in our faces as has happened in other cities with big spending teams.  After thriving off our snarky superiority over big spending clubs when they fail, Sabres fans (and to an extent, the franchise as well) must be aware that we may soon become what we've mocked and loathed: a cap-busting flop. Sure, we want Ehrhoff to play well, but what we really want is to avoid the buyers remorse and league-wide ridicule that would come with a sub-par first season from him.  And, of course, we hope that Ville Leino scores 25 or so and settles into a role as the center of the second scoring line, but we also don't want WGR to have an excuse to dig into Pegula, Ted Black and Regier about the wisdom of spending big on relatively unproven players. 

Those kinds of criticisms, if they follow poor play, will likely be deserved, but they'll also be a distraction. Honestly, is there anything that sucks the fun out of Sabres hockey more than WGR having a legitimate reason to bitch? As if they need one.

Of course, any one of the Sabres' big money signings could be a bust and the team still successful in spite of that, and that might soften the blow of a long term contract that proves dead weight. Yet, for all the criticism we, as a fan base, have lodged at awful deals in the league (see: DiPietro, Rick), it will be especially painful to have to watch Darcy dig himself out of one of these new contracts in a year or two.

This all said, I am optimistic for the personal success of Leino, Ehrhoff, Regehr and Myers (gotta throw him in... his deal is great, I think, but not without big risk), and the likelihood that they can collectively stave off any criticism of this team being a hot mess of overpriced parts. 


#2: Will Ryan Miller play fewer than 65 games?

Picture
With all the talk about the big signings of the summer, without a doubt the biggest barometer of Sabres success remains Ryan Miller.  We know this.  And, for someone carrying the team for so long, as Miller has, the biggest barometer of his success is how rested and on point he is, much of which is going to be linked to how many games he ends up playing.

I'm sure the stats end up bearing this out, or maybe they don't, but I don't think anyone would begrudge giving Miller more nights off, so long as they don't automatically mean that we lose. Finally, in the diminutive frame of Jhonas Enroth, the Sabres have a netminder with the apparent ability to go out and win, as well as the apparent confidence of his head coach.  With Enroth being the #2, particularly after the homestretch run he put together to put the Sabres into the playoffs, fans have every reason to expect that Miller will start around 60 games, and that he'll be better prepared for a long playoff run.

The big question is whether Lindy sticks with this ideal plan, or buckles under the pressure of a short stint of losses from the young Swedish goalie. Enroth has proven himself capable, so I hope that Lindy gives him a long enough leash for the kid to prove his worth to the team - both in terms of saving Miller and getting wins. 


#3: Will Drew Stafford Regress?


Picture
After I wrote this during the summer, this third question is of particular relevance for my own pride. Dude got a good - not great, I think - deal coming off a contract year performance.  As I wrote back in June, I liked this deal because it adhered to Pegula's promise to give the organization a clean slate when he took over. The message was clear: Put Up or Shut Up. Message received, Stafford was great during  the Sabres' stretch run, as well as all year, and even though his stats were arguably padded by a couple Bruins games, you simply couldn't cut this guy loose and expect everyone to still buy what Pegula was selling.

So, contract signed, the question is whether Stafford will perform his side of the deal and give the team a level of production commiserate with the money he's now making.  We saw greatness from Stafford over the course of last year, and with Derek Roy out, I think its fair to say that Drew was the most consistent Sabre on the team.  Sure, TV Party carried the team on many, if not most, nights, but Stafford was a steady hand and producer on the ice.  And those things matter.

Finally, you may remember that, at the start of last season, reports came out that Stafford had been working out with Zach Parise during the off-season, which I saw to be a positive sign of things to come from #21.We now know that his commitment to physical excellence has continued, thank God....


#4:Will the Sabres' strides in social media and web access continue?

I'm not sure this even merits a spot on the list, given the meager significance it has for some fans. Indeed, this is less of a team issue, for sure, and will certainly not matter a lick to how the team performs on the ice, but I think it could be a seminal issue for fans and how they consume the Sabres brand over the next year. I have to say that I've been pleasantly surprised with the things the Sabres have done to interact with fans via social media and live chats and, more recently, invitations to the public season ticket deliveries last week. All signs point to the team getting social media and its utility for the franchise, though our sample size is largely limited to off-season events and not games.  With the season starting and the issues for immediate discussion broadening towards actual results on the ice, I wonder how the team will either increase or scale back these kind of live chat initiatives. 

I don't have much of an opinion on how this will play out. Yet, for a City and a fan base starving for a greater swath of opinions and analysis than is currently produced by the tandem of WGR and TBN, I amconscious of my hope that the product of any team-blogger interactions is of high quality and does not amount to a lost opportunity.


#5: How long will it take for me to unleash hell on Derek Roy's Twitter feed?
Picture
Let me first say that I have come to accept Derek Roy on the ice. Dude is a talent, and he's matured beyond the ineffective young kid who we all used to love to hate. I like him as our #1 center, at least for now, and I'm less disappointed than some that we didn't hop headfirst into the Brad Richards sweepstakes (though, I remain a little angry that Yachtsman didn't follow directions when we told him to kidnap Paul Stastny when he went to Colorado this summer). 

That said, DEREK ROY IS HORRIBLE ON TWITTER. Some of you may find it endearing, or may casually find it amusing, but his fucking twitter feed is really less about giggles and more about face palms for me. I'm not sure if the dude is serious, but it seems pretty fucking likely that he is.  Despite the many moments of sheer bewilderment at the stupidity of his tweets this summer, I have thus far refrained from lashing out at him. Again, I like the guy as a player and increasingly veteran presence on the team, but I wonder how long this exercise in self-restraint will last.

When my rage becomes too much, I'll probably lash out here, rather than directly to him on the tweet machine, and I highly doubt that any of you want to watch me self-destruct so very completely. What am I saying? YOU ALL WANT THAT.  In any event, this will be tough for me.  Sure, I've pissed on Tim Connolly and the clowns at WGR, but those are easy targets - I don't like any of those guys.  Again, Derek Roy is our center, and I want to like him. I don't want to dish out a plate of "you're a small-minded midget who can't possibly comprehend how much of an ass bag you appear in your tweets." But, he's seriously pushing me to that place, and it's anyone's guess how long I can last before I open a bottle of whiskey and see what kind of drunken disaster I drop here.

Upside is that, when that day comes, it is going to be FUN.

So, wrapping up this post, it bears mentioning that, in the end, I'm absurdly pumped for this next journey of Sabres hockey to begin. Lots of questions to be answered, and the DGWU Crew will be breaking it down one poorly constructed post after the other. You know you're impressed.

Oh, and shit! The Sabres play tonight. Against the Leafs and Tim Connolly. HILARIOUS.

Let's Go Buffalo
 


Comments

Corey
09/24/2011 10:37

i think derek will stop using his twitter account during the regular season. should save you.

Reply
West of the Cascades
09/24/2011 12:53

Great article, and thanks especially for mentioning the Pegula-fracking tie-in. I live in Oregon and work exclusively on environmental issues and have friends who are fighting oil and gas drilling in PA and the Southern Tier and I still love Pegula and what he's done for the Sabres. And it does feel really weird and dirty some times, but I think winning the Cup would make it easier, and besides he's not doing it any more and if we just regulated the hell out of fracking it would stop and everything would be OK.

Or so I delude myself ...

Reply
BigCrockSound
09/25/2011 23:13

This ought to help keep your Roy flames stoked!

http://youtu.be/JMdEDt-B3O0

Reply



Leave a Reply


weebly analytics var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-7870337-1']); _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', 'none']); _gaq.push(['_setAllowLinker', true]); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })();